Comparative Study of Knowledge Acquisition, Satisfaction, Self-Confidence and Perceived Support in Nursing Students Experiencing Simulation Versus Clinical Placement in Perinatal Care

Authors

  • Catherine Pépin Author
  • Marilyn Aita Université de Montréal Author
  • Andréane Lavallée Author
  • Johanne Goudreau Université de Montréal Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17483/2368-6669.1295

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare nursing students experiencing simulations (SIM group) (n = 25) versus clinical placement (CPG) (n = 55) in perinatal care. Questionnaires on satisfaction, self-confidence, and perceived support were completed by both groups. Knowledge acquisition was assessed using standardized course evaluation. The Student’s t-test showed that differences between groups were not statistically significant for knowledge acquisition and satisfaction, while they were statistically significant for self-confidence and perceived support with higher scores in the CPG group. This study contributes to knowledge development since few have compared simulations as a learning method to replace totally clinical placement. Findings support the simulations as an appropriate method for students’ knowledge acquisition and satisfaction in a perinatal care course, but more studies are needed for generalization.

Downloads

Published

February 15, 2022

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Comparative Study of Knowledge Acquisition, Satisfaction, Self-Confidence and Perceived Support in Nursing Students Experiencing Simulation Versus Clinical Placement in Perinatal Care. (2022). Quality Advancement in Nursing Education - Avancées En Formation infirmière, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.17483/2368-6669.1295